Home .Environment Japan's whaling obsession
Japan's whaling obsession
Friday, 07 October 2011 05:47

The Japanese government has just announced that it will proceed with its annual whale hunt in the Southern Ocean.  The Australian government is mounting a legal challenge in the International Court of Justic.  The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, a militant anti-whaling NGO, plans to disturb the Japanese fleet once again.

In my two and half years in Japan, I regularly quizzed Japanese people about whaling.  Not one of my interlocutors eats whale meat. 

Indeed, they all have vivid memories of the horrible taste of the whale meat they ate at school.  And yet, according to opinion polls, the Japanese public strongly support whale hunting.

What is the explanation for Japan's indecent obsession with whaling?  In a 2009 article, Midori Kagawa-Fox unlocks the political mystery of Japan's whale hunting. 

We must acknowledge that the Japanese people have a long tradition of eating whale.  In prehistoric times, whale meat was eaten when dead whales were washed ashore.  Way back in the 12th century, Japanese historical records show that whales were then caught by hand harpoon.  A whale industry even appeared to develop in the 17th century -- Japan's first lighthouse was built at Tomyo Misaki in 1636.  And by the 19th century, it had become a mature industry as harpoon guns were mounted on on steam-powered whaling ships.

After the second World War, the American occupiers encouraged the food-short Japanese to go back to whale hunting.  And by the 1960s, Japan was eating more whale meat than any other time of meat.  In the 1970s, however, whale numbers started declining.  And then opposition to commercial whaling became strong as the environmental movement became concerned about the effects on the marine eco-system of over-harvesting of whales.

In 1987, Japan accepted the International Whaling Commission's moratorium on commercial whaling, but retained the right to conduct whaling for scientific research purposes.  Japan usually aims to catch 1000 whales each year in the Antarctic waters.  Everyone knows that this research whaling is a cover for commercial whaling. 

Japan's whale research has not produced any worthwhile results.  It could be undertaken with a much lower whale catch.  According to some scientists, the research could even be undertaken without catching whales at all.    Protestors have thus been aggressive in their attacks on the Japanese whalers.  The environmental movement in Australia and other countries is determined to stop this whaling.

To understand why Japan persists with whaling, Midori Kagawa-Fox argues that you need to analyse the behaviour of Japan's "whaling triangle", a triad of Japan's ruling elite.  These vested interests receive direct financial benefits from Japan's whaling policy. 

This is just one variant of the Japanese "Iron Triangle" that has governed Japan since the World War 2.  Bureaucrats, politicians and industry get together behind closed doors to put together deals and policies to run the country.  The Japanese people accepted this system for a long time, as it delivered economic growth and jobs for several decades.  But, this model ran out of steam two decades ago when Japan's bubble burst. 

But Japan's "Whaling Triangle" may survive much longer.  It is able to present itself as a defender of Japan's unique traditions against a hostile outside world of Japan bashers. 

So, who are the members of this "Whaling Triangle"?

First, there is the Whaling Section of the Fisheries Agency within the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.  It runs Japan's whaling policy, administering the big subsidies that keep the policy running.  It also promotes whale consumption through marketing campaigns, and school and hospital meals -- consumption of whale meat has not however been increasing.  It provides Official Development Assistance to pro-whaling Caribbean countries, and supports their membership of the International Whaling Commission.  Its ambition is to restore commercial whaling.  JFA is a powerful government body, as the sea supplies about 40 per cent of the Japanese diet. 

Second, there is the Institute of Cetacean Research which is responsible for Japan's whaling research.  It runs the whaling expeditions, and sells the whale meat.  Thanks to the proceeds from whale meat sales and also government subsidies, it makes massive profits. 

Third, there is the Japan Fisheries Association which is a lobby group for the whole fishing industry which again benefits greatly from subsidies to undertake whaling.  It plays a very iimportant role in determining whaling policy through its close connections with the Fiaheries Agency.  It also receives massive payments (16 billion yen in 2007-08) from the Fisheries Agency for projects like the promotion, preservation and support of the fishing industry.  

This triangle is held together in typical Japanese fashion.  Upon retirement, senior bureaucrats from the Fisheries Agency land jobs (parachuting or "amakudari") in the Japan Fisheries Association, exploiting the benefits from their cosy relationship.  From this position, they are in a position to negotiate a continuation of subsidies from their former subordinates, who have now been promoted into their previous positions.

It is held together by a discourse which justifies "whale cheating" on the basis of Japan's unique cultural traditions.  The Japanese media is complicit in this, as doesn't present all sides of the issue.  Also, the fact that the international debate is led by NGOs does not help its credibility in Japanese eyes.  Japan's democracy does not yet have a rich and diverse civil society.  And ordinary citizens have a naturally suspicious attitude towards NGOs.   

At this very moment, Japan has a lot more important things to do than whaling.  The government should be fully focused on the expensive recovery from the triple crisis of earthquake. tsumani and nuclear disaster.  With puiblic debt now exceeding 200 per cent of GDP, the Japanese government is looking for expenditure savings.  There would be no better expenditure to cut that whaling subsidies!

At the same time, the international protests against Japan's whaling may also be counter-productive.  The nation's confidence has been badly hit by the triple crisis.  And appearing to cave into the Australian government and the Sea Shepherd Society would not be good medicine for national pride and honor -- all the more so given that the Japanese fleet had to cut short its hunt last season due to the ferocious clashes with the Sea Shepherd.

Significant portions of the Japanese government reportedly are keen to stop the annual whale hunt.  But Japanese decision-making is based on consensus, rather than leadership for the overall national interest.  This means that the interests of the "Whaling Triangle" will be immensely difficult to overcome because they will always block a consensus.

Reference:

Kagawa-Fox, Midori, "Japan's Whaling Triangle -- The Power Behind the Whaling Policy".  Japanese Studies, Volume 29, Number 3, December 2009, pages 401-414. 

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10371390903298078#preview  

 


rssfeed
Email Drucken Favoriten Twitter Facebook Myspace blogger google Yahoo
 

Copyright © 2011 Mr Globalization - Tackling the paradoxes of globalisation. All Rights Reserved.

Malaysia.jpg
Israel.jpg
Suriname.jpg
Romania.jpg
Costa_Rica.jpg
Bhutan.jpg
Brunei.jpg
Egypt.jpg
Zimbabwe.jpg
Solomon_Islands.jpg
Iraq.jpg
Serbia.jpg
Russia.jpg
Liberia.jpg
Kuwait.jpg
Turkey.jpg
Australia.jpg
Bolivia.jpg
Croatia.jpg
Lesotho.jpg